Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Years to Teaspoon per Weeks Converter — mm3/yr to tsp/wk
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr) to Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per years = 0.0000038883 teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Years to Teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-17 / 8.14967195e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Years to Teaspoon per Weeks
Cubic Millimeter per Years and Teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
teaspoon per weeks = cubic millimeter per years × 0.00000388834528697
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per years equals 3.168874e-17 base units, and 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per years-to-teaspoon per weeks factor of 0.00000388834528697.
Simple example
1 mm3/yr × 0.000003888345287 = 0.0000038883 tsp/wk
1 cubic millimeter per years = 0.0000038883 teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mm3/yr × 0.000003888345287 = 0.0002333007 tsp/wk
60 cubic millimeter per years = 0.0002333007 teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr) | Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/yr | 3.888345e-7 tsp/wk |
| 1 mm3/yr | 0.0000038883 tsp/wk |
| 10 mm3/yr | 0.0000388835 tsp/wk |
| 60 mm3/yr | 0.0002333007 tsp/wk |
| 100 mm3/yr | 0.0003888345 tsp/wk |
| 1,000 mm3/yr | 0.0038883453 tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Years
0.0000038883 tsp/wk × 257178.8065 = 0.9999883532 mm3/yr
0.0000038883 teaspoon per weeks = 0.9999883532 cubic millimeter per years.
cubic millimeter per years = teaspoon per weeks × 257178.806458
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Years.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many teaspoon per weeks are in 1 cubic millimeter per years?
1 cubic millimeter per years equals 0.0000038883 teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per years to teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per years value by 0.000003888345287. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks back to cubic millimeter per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 257,178.8065 cubic millimeter per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per years?
Cubic Millimeter per Years (mm3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per years to teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per years and teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003888345287 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.