Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic yards per Fortnight to Milliliters per Millisecond Converter — yd3/fn to mL/ms
Convert Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn) to Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic yard per fortnight = 0.0006320725 milliliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic yards per Fortnight to Milliliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 6.32072469e-7 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic yards per Fortnight to Milliliters per Millisecond
Cubic yard per Fortnight and Milliliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per millisecond = cubic yards per fortnight × 0.000632072468571
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic yard per fortnight equals 6.320725e-7 base units, and 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic yard per fortnight-to-milliliter per millisecond factor of 0.000632072468571.
Simple example
1 yd3/fn × 0.0006320724686 = 0.0006320725 mL/ms
1 cubic yard per fortnight = 0.0006320725 milliliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 yd3/fn × 0.0006320724686 = 0.0379243481 mL/ms
60 cubic yards per fortnight = 0.0379243481 milliliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn) | Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 yd3/fn | 0.0000632072 mL/ms |
| 1 yd3/fn | 0.0006320725 mL/ms |
| 10 yd3/fn | 0.0063207247 mL/ms |
| 60 yd3/fn | 0.0379243481 mL/ms |
| 100 yd3/fn | 0.0632072469 mL/ms |
| 1,000 yd3/fn | 0.6320724686 mL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Fortnight
0.0006320725 mL/ms × 1582.097069 = 1.00000005 yd3/fn
0.0006320725 milliliters per millisecond = 1.00000005 cubic yards per fortnight.
cubic yards per fortnight = milliliters per millisecond × 1582.09706912
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic yard per fortnight?
1 cubic yard per fortnight equals 0.0006320725 milliliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic yard per fortnight to milliliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic yard per fortnight value by 0.0006320724686. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond back to cubic yard per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 1,582.097069 cubic yards per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic yard per fortnight?
Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic yard per fortnight to milliliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic yard per fortnight and milliliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0006320724686 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.