Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic yards per Fortnight to Quarts per Millisecond Converter — yd3/fn to qt/ms
Convert Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn) to Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic yard per fortnight = 6.679035e-7 quart per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic yards per Fortnight to Quarts per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 6.32072469e-7 / 0.946352946.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic yards per Fortnight to Quarts per Millisecond
Cubic yard per Fortnight and Quart per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quarts per millisecond = cubic yards per fortnight × 6.679035e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic yard per fortnight equals 6.320725e-7 base units, and 1 quart per millisecond equals 0.946352946 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic yard per fortnight-to-quart per millisecond factor of 6.679035e-7.
Simple example
1 yd3/fn × 6.679035e-7 = 6.679035e-7 qt/ms
1 cubic yard per fortnight = 6.679035e-7 quarts per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 yd3/fn × 6.679035e-7 = 0.0000400742 qt/ms
60 cubic yards per fortnight = 0.0000400742 quarts per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn) | Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 yd3/fn | 6.679035e-8 qt/ms |
| 1 yd3/fn | 6.679035e-7 qt/ms |
| 10 yd3/fn | 0.000006679 qt/ms |
| 60 yd3/fn | 0.0000400742 qt/ms |
| 100 yd3/fn | 0.0000667904 qt/ms |
| 1,000 yd3/fn | 0.0006679035 qt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Fortnight
6.679035e-7 qt/ms × 1497222.222 = 0.9999999625 yd3/fn
6.679035e-7 quarts per millisecond = 0.9999999625 cubic yards per fortnight.
cubic yards per fortnight = quarts per millisecond × 1497222.22222
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quarts per millisecond are in 1 cubic yard per fortnight?
1 cubic yard per fortnight equals 6.679035e-7 quarts per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic yard per fortnight to quart per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic yard per fortnight value by 6.679035e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per millisecond back to cubic yard per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per millisecond equals 1,497,222.222 cubic yards per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic yard per fortnight?
Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per millisecond?
Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic yard per fortnight to quart per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic yard per fortnight and quart per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6.679035e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.