Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic yards per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — yd3/ms to ft3/ms
Convert Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic yard per millisecond = 27 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic yards per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 764.554858 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic yards per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Cubic yard per Millisecond and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = cubic yards per millisecond × 27
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554857984 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic yard per millisecond-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 27.
Simple example
1 yd3/ms × 27 = 27 ft3/ms
1 cubic yard per millisecond = 27 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 yd3/ms × 27 = 1,620 ft3/ms
60 cubic yards per millisecond = 1,620 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 yd3/ms | 2.7 ft3/ms |
| 1 yd3/ms | 27 ft3/ms |
| 10 yd3/ms | 270 ft3/ms |
| 60 yd3/ms | 1,620 ft3/ms |
| 100 yd3/ms | 2,700 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 yd3/ms | 27,000 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Millisecond
27 ft3/ms × 0.03703703704 = 1 yd3/ms
27 cubic feet per millisecond = 1 cubic yard per millisecond.
cubic yards per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 0.037037037037
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 cubic yard per millisecond?
1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 27 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic yard per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic yard per millisecond value by 27. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to cubic yard per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 0.037037037 cubic yards per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic yard per millisecond?
Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic yard per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic yard per millisecond and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 27 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.