Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic yard per Weeks to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — yd3/wk to imp qt/wk
Convert Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic yard per weeks = 672.7142296 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic yard per Weeks to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.26414494e-6 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic yard per Weeks to Imperial quart per Weeks
Cubic yard per Weeks and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = cubic yard per weeks × 672.714229577
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic yard per weeks equals 0.00000126414493714 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic yard per weeks-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 672.714229577.
Simple example
1 yd3/wk × 672.7142296 = 672.7142296 imp qt/wk
1 cubic yard per weeks = 672.7142296 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 yd3/wk × 672.7142296 = 40,362.85377 imp qt/wk
60 cubic yard per weeks = 40,362.85377 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 yd3/wk | 67.27142296 imp qt/wk |
| 1 yd3/wk | 672.7142296 imp qt/wk |
| 10 yd3/wk | 6,727.142296 imp qt/wk |
| 60 yd3/wk | 40,362.85377 imp qt/wk |
| 100 yd3/wk | 67,271.42296 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 yd3/wk | 672,714.2296 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic yard per Weeks
672.7142296 imp qt/wk × 0.001486515308 = 1 yd3/wk
672.7142296 imperial quart per weeks = 1 cubic yard per weeks.
cubic yard per weeks = imperial quart per weeks × 0.00148651530774
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Cubic yard per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 cubic yard per weeks?
1 cubic yard per weeks equals 672.7142296 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic yard per weeks to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the cubic yard per weeks value by 672.7142296. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to cubic yard per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0014865153 cubic yard per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic yard per weeks?
Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic yard per weeks to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic yard per weeks and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 672.7142296 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.