Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic yard per Years to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — yd3/yr to ft3/ms
Convert Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic yard per years = 8.555959e-10 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic yard per Years to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.4227779e-8 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic yard per Years to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Cubic yard per Years and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = cubic yard per years × 8.555959e-10
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic yard per years equals 2.422778e-8 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic yard per years-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 8.555959e-10.
Simple example
1 yd3/yr × 8.555959e-10 = 8.555959e-10 ft3/ms
1 cubic yard per years = 8.555959e-10 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 yd3/yr × 8.555959e-10 = 5.133576e-8 ft3/ms
60 cubic yard per years = 5.133576e-8 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 yd3/yr | 8.555959e-11 ft3/ms |
| 1 yd3/yr | 8.555959e-10 ft3/ms |
| 10 yd3/yr | 8.555959e-9 ft3/ms |
| 60 yd3/yr | 5.133576e-8 ft3/ms |
| 100 yd3/yr | 8.555959e-8 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 yd3/yr | 8.555959e-7 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Years
8.555959e-10 ft3/ms × 1168776000 = 0.9999999536 yd3/yr
8.555959e-10 cubic feet per millisecond = 0.9999999536 cubic yard per years.
cubic yard per years = cubic feet per millisecond × 1168776000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Years.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 cubic yard per years?
1 cubic yard per years equals 8.555959e-10 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic yard per years to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic yard per years value by 8.555959e-10. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to cubic yard per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 1,168,776,000 cubic yard per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic yard per years?
Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic yard per years to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic yard per years and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.555959e-10 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.