Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic yard per Years to Imperial quart per Seconds Converter — yd3/yr to imp qt/s
Convert Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) to Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic yard per years = 0.0000213175 imperial quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic yard per Years to Imperial quart per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.4227779e-8 / 0.0011365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic yard per Years to Imperial quart per Seconds
Cubic yard per Years and Imperial quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per seconds = cubic yard per years × 0.0000213174653109
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic yard per years equals 2.422778e-8 base units, and 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic yard per years-to-imperial quart per seconds factor of 0.0000213174653109.
Simple example
1 yd3/yr × 0.00002131746531 = 0.0000213175 imp qt/s
1 cubic yard per years = 0.0000213175 imperial quart per seconds.
Real-world example
60 yd3/yr × 0.00002131746531 = 0.0012790479 imp qt/s
60 cubic yard per years = 0.0012790479 imperial quart per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) | Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 yd3/yr | 0.0000021317 imp qt/s |
| 1 yd3/yr | 0.0000213175 imp qt/s |
| 10 yd3/yr | 0.0002131747 imp qt/s |
| 60 yd3/yr | 0.0012790479 imp qt/s |
| 100 yd3/yr | 0.0021317465 imp qt/s |
| 1,000 yd3/yr | 0.0213174653 imp qt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic yard per Years
0.0000213175 imp qt/s × 46909.89221 = 1.000001627 yd3/yr
0.0000213175 imperial quart per seconds = 1.000001627 cubic yard per years.
cubic yard per years = imperial quart per seconds × 46909.8922136
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic yard per Years.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per seconds are in 1 cubic yard per years?
1 cubic yard per years equals 0.0000213175 imperial quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic yard per years to imperial quart per seconds?
Multiply the cubic yard per years value by 0.00002131746531. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds back to cubic yard per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 46,909.89221 cubic yard per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic yard per years?
Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic yard per years to imperial quart per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic yard per years and imperial quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00002131746531 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.