Volumetric flow rate.
Metric cup per Hours to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — metric cup/h to ft3/ms
Convert Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric cup per hours = 2.452407e-9 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric cup per Hours to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 6.94444444e-8 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric cup per Hours to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Metric cup per Hours and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = metric cup per hours × 2.452407e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric cup per hours equals 6.944444e-8 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric cup per hours-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 2.452407e-9.
Simple example
1 metric cup/h × 2.452407e-9 = 2.452407e-9 ft3/ms
1 metric cup per hours = 2.452407e-9 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 metric cup/h × 2.452407e-9 = 1.471444e-7 ft3/ms
60 metric cup per hours = 1.471444e-7 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric cup/h | 2.452407e-10 ft3/ms |
| 1 metric cup/h | 2.452407e-9 ft3/ms |
| 10 metric cup/h | 2.452407e-8 ft3/ms |
| 60 metric cup/h | 1.471444e-7 ft3/ms |
| 100 metric cup/h | 2.452407e-7 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 metric cup/h | 0.0000024524 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Metric cup per Hours
2.452407e-9 ft3/ms × 407762590.9 = 0.9999998323 metric cup/h
2.452407e-9 cubic feet per millisecond = 0.9999998323 metric cup per hours.
metric cup per hours = cubic feet per millisecond × 407762590.925
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Metric cup per Hours.
Understanding the Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 metric cup per hours?
1 metric cup per hours equals 2.452407e-9 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric cup per hours to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the metric cup per hours value by 2.452407e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to metric cup per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 407,762,590.9 metric cup per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric cup per hours?
Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric cup per hours to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric cup per hours and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.452407e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.