Volumetric flow rate.
Metric cup per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — metric cup/h to imp qt/wk
Convert Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric cup per hours = 36.95483371 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric cup per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 6.94444444e-8 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric cup per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks
Metric cup per Hours and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = metric cup per hours × 36.9548337142
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric cup per hours equals 6.944444e-8 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric cup per hours-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 36.9548337142.
Simple example
1 metric cup/h × 36.95483371 = 36.95483371 imp qt/wk
1 metric cup per hours = 36.95483371 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 metric cup/h × 36.95483371 = 2,217.290023 imp qt/wk
60 metric cup per hours = 2,217.290023 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric cup/h | 3.695483371 imp qt/wk |
| 1 metric cup/h | 36.95483371 imp qt/wk |
| 10 metric cup/h | 369.5483371 imp qt/wk |
| 60 metric cup/h | 2,217.290023 imp qt/wk |
| 100 metric cup/h | 3,695.483371 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 metric cup/h | 36,954.83371 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Metric cup per Hours
36.95483371 imp qt/wk × 0.02706005952 = 0.9999999999 metric cup/h
36.95483371 imperial quart per weeks = 0.9999999999 metric cup per hours.
metric cup per hours = imperial quart per weeks × 0.0270600595238
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Metric cup per Hours.
Understanding the Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 metric cup per hours?
1 metric cup per hours equals 36.95483371 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric cup per hours to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the metric cup per hours value by 36.95483371. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to metric cup per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0270600595 metric cup per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric cup per hours?
Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric cup per hours to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric cup per hours and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 36.95483371 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.