Volumetric flow rate.
Cup per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — cup/decade to mm3/s
Convert Cup per Decades (cup/decade) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cup per decades = 0.0007497183 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cup per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.49718276e-13 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cup per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Cup per Decades and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = cup per decades × 0.000749718276024
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cup per decades equals 7.497183e-13 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cup per decades-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 0.000749718276024.
Simple example
1 cup/decade × 0.000749718276 = 0.0007497183 mm3/s
1 cup per decades = 0.0007497183 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cup/decade × 0.000749718276 = 0.0449830966 mm3/s
60 cup per decades = 0.0449830966 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cup per Decades (cup/decade) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cup/decade | 0.0000749718 mm3/s |
| 1 cup/decade | 0.0007497183 mm3/s |
| 10 cup/decade | 0.0074971828 mm3/s |
| 60 cup/decade | 0.0449830966 mm3/s |
| 100 cup/decade | 0.0749718276 mm3/s |
| 1,000 cup/decade | 0.749718276 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cup per Decades
0.0007497183 mm3/s × 1333.834364 = 1.000000032 cup/decade
0.0007497183 cubic millimeter per seconds = 1.000000032 cup per decades.
cup per decades = cubic millimeter per seconds × 1333.83436416
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cup per Decades.
Understanding the Cup per Decades (cup/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 cup per decades?
1 cup per decades equals 0.0007497183 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cup per decades to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the cup per decades value by 0.000749718276. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to cup per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1,333.834364 cup per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cup per decades?
Cup per Decades (cup/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cup per decades to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cup per decades and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000749718276 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.