Volumetric flow rate.
Cup per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — cup/h to cm3/ms
Convert Cup per Hours (cup/h) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cup per hours = 0.000065719 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cup per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 6.57189546e-8 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cup per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Cup per Hours and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = cup per hours × 0.0000657189545833
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cup per hours equals 6.571895e-8 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cup per hours-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 0.0000657189545833.
Simple example
1 cup/h × 0.00006571895458 = 0.000065719 cm3/ms
1 cup per hours = 0.000065719 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cup/h × 0.00006571895458 = 0.0039431373 cm3/ms
60 cup per hours = 0.0039431373 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cup per Hours (cup/h) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cup/h | 0.0000065719 cm3/ms |
| 1 cup/h | 0.000065719 cm3/ms |
| 10 cup/h | 0.0006571895 cm3/ms |
| 60 cup/h | 0.0039431373 cm3/ms |
| 100 cup/h | 0.0065718955 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 cup/h | 0.0657189546 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Cup per Hours
0.000065719 cm3/ms × 15216.31022 = 1.000000691 cup/h
0.000065719 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 1.000000691 cup per hours.
cup per hours = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 15216.3102158
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Cup per Hours.
Understanding the Cup per Hours (cup/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 cup per hours?
1 cup per hours equals 0.000065719 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cup per hours to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the cup per hours value by 0.00006571895458. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to cup per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 15,216.31022 cup per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cup per hours?
Cup per Hours (cup/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cup per hours to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cup per hours and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00006571895458 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.