Cup per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — cup/h to mm3/s

Convert Cup per Hours (cup/h) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cup per hours = 65.71895458 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Cup per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 cup per hours = 65.71895458 cubic millimeter per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 6.57189546e-8 / 1e-9.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Cup per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds

Cup per Hours and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

cubic millimeter per seconds = cup per hours × 65.7189545833

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cup per hours equals 6.571895e-8 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cup per hours-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 65.7189545833.

Simple example

1 cup/h × 65.71895458 = 65.71895458 mm3/s

1 cup per hours = 65.71895458 cubic millimeter per seconds.

Real-world example

60 cup/h × 65.71895458 = 3,943.137275 mm3/s

60 cup per hours = 3,943.137275 cubic millimeter per seconds.

Conversion table

Cup per Hours (cup/h)Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
0.1 cup/h6.571895458 mm3/s
1 cup/h65.71895458 mm3/s
10 cup/h657.1895458 mm3/s
60 cup/h3,943.137275 mm3/s
100 cup/h6,571.895458 mm3/s
1,000 cup/h65,718.95458 mm3/s

Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cup per Hours

65.71895458 mm3/s × 0.01521631022 = 0.9999999999 cup/h

65.71895458 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.9999999999 cup per hours.

cup per hours = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.0152163102158

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cup per Hours.

Understanding the Cup per Hours (cup/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 cup per hours?

1 cup per hours equals 65.71895458 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert cup per hours to cubic millimeter per seconds?

Multiply the cup per hours value by 65.71895458. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to cup per hours?

Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.0152163102 cup per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a cup per hours?

Cup per Hours (cup/h) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?

Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the cup per hours to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both cup per hours and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 65.71895458 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.