Volumetric flow rate.
Cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — cup/wk to mm3/ms
Convert Cup per Weeks (cup/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cup per weeks = 0.0003911843 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.91184253e-10 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Cup per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = cup per weeks × 0.000391184253472
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cup per weeks equals 3.911843e-10 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cup per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 0.000391184253472.
Simple example
1 cup/wk × 0.0003911842535 = 0.0003911843 mm3/ms
1 cup per weeks = 0.0003911843 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cup/wk × 0.0003911842535 = 0.0234710552 mm3/ms
60 cup per weeks = 0.0234710552 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cup per Weeks (cup/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cup/wk | 0.0000391184 mm3/ms |
| 1 cup/wk | 0.0003911843 mm3/ms |
| 10 cup/wk | 0.0039118425 mm3/ms |
| 60 cup/wk | 0.0234710552 mm3/ms |
| 100 cup/wk | 0.0391184254 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 cup/wk | 0.3911842535 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Cup per Weeks
0.0003911843 mm3/ms × 2556.340116 = 1.000000119 cup/wk
0.0003911843 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 1.000000119 cup per weeks.
cup per weeks = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 2556.34011626
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Cup per Weeks.
Understanding the Cup per Weeks (cup/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 cup per weeks?
1 cup per weeks equals 0.0003911843 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cup per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the cup per weeks value by 0.0003911842535. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to cup per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 2,556.340116 cup per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cup per weeks?
Cup per Weeks (cup/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cup per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cup per weeks and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0003911842535 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.