Volumetric flow rate.
Decaliter per Decades to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — daL/decade to cL/s
Convert Decaliter per Decades (daL/decade) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 decaliter per decades = 0.0000031689 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Decaliter per Decades to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-11 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Decaliter per Decades to Centiliter per Seconds
Decaliter per Decades and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = decaliter per decades × 0.00000316887385068
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 decaliter per decades equals 3.168874e-11 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct decaliter per decades-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 0.00000316887385068.
Simple example
1 daL/decade × 0.000003168873851 = 0.0000031689 cL/s
1 decaliter per decades = 0.0000031689 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 daL/decade × 0.000003168873851 = 0.0001901324 cL/s
60 decaliter per decades = 0.0001901324 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Decaliter per Decades (daL/decade) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 daL/decade | 3.168874e-7 cL/s |
| 1 daL/decade | 0.0000031689 cL/s |
| 10 daL/decade | 0.0000316887 cL/s |
| 60 daL/decade | 0.0001901324 cL/s |
| 100 daL/decade | 0.0003168874 cL/s |
| 1,000 daL/decade | 0.0031688739 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Decaliter per Decades
0.0000031689 cL/s × 315569.52 = 1.000008252 daL/decade
0.0000031689 centiliter per seconds = 1.000008252 decaliter per decades.
decaliter per decades = centiliter per seconds × 315569.52
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Decaliter per Decades.
Understanding the Decaliter per Decades (daL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 decaliter per decades?
1 decaliter per decades equals 0.0000031689 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert decaliter per decades to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the decaliter per decades value by 0.000003168873851. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to decaliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 315,569.52 decaliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a decaliter per decades?
Decaliter per Decades (daL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the decaliter per decades to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both decaliter per decades and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003168873851 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.