Volumetric flow rate.
Decaliter per Decades to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — daL/decade to mL/s
Convert Decaliter per Decades (daL/decade) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 decaliter per decades = 0.0000316887 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Decaliter per Decades to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-11 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Decaliter per Decades to Milliliter per Seconds
Decaliter per Decades and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = decaliter per decades × 0.0000316887385068
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 decaliter per decades equals 3.168874e-11 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct decaliter per decades-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 0.0000316887385068.
Simple example
1 daL/decade × 0.00003168873851 = 0.0000316887 mL/s
1 decaliter per decades = 0.0000316887 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 daL/decade × 0.00003168873851 = 0.0019013243 mL/s
60 decaliter per decades = 0.0019013243 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Decaliter per Decades (daL/decade) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 daL/decade | 0.0000031689 mL/s |
| 1 daL/decade | 0.0000316887 mL/s |
| 10 daL/decade | 0.0003168874 mL/s |
| 60 daL/decade | 0.0019013243 mL/s |
| 100 daL/decade | 0.0031688739 mL/s |
| 1,000 daL/decade | 0.0316887385 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Decaliter per Decades
0.0000316887 mL/s × 31556.952 = 0.9999987848 daL/decade
0.0000316887 milliliter per seconds = 0.9999987848 decaliter per decades.
decaliter per decades = milliliter per seconds × 31556.952
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Decaliter per Decades.
Understanding the Decaliter per Decades (daL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 decaliter per decades?
1 decaliter per decades equals 0.0000316887 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert decaliter per decades to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the decaliter per decades value by 0.00003168873851. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to decaliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 31,556.952 decaliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a decaliter per decades?
Decaliter per Decades (daL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the decaliter per decades to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both decaliter per decades and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00003168873851 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.