Volumetric flow rate.
Decaliter per Minutes to Cubic Meters per Millisecond Converter — daL/min to m3/ms
Convert Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) to Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 decaliter per minutes = 1.666667e-7 cubic meter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Decaliter per Minutes to Cubic Meters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0001666666667 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Decaliter per Minutes to Cubic Meters per Millisecond
Decaliter per Minutes and Cubic Meter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meters per millisecond = decaliter per minutes × 1.666667e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 decaliter per minutes equals 0.000166666666667 base units, and 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct decaliter per minutes-to-cubic meter per millisecond factor of 1.666667e-7.
Simple example
1 daL/min × 1.666667e-7 = 1.666667e-7 m3/ms
1 decaliter per minutes = 1.666667e-7 cubic meters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 daL/min × 1.666667e-7 = 0.00001 m3/ms
60 decaliter per minutes = 0.00001 cubic meters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) | Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 daL/min | 1.666667e-8 m3/ms |
| 1 daL/min | 1.666667e-7 m3/ms |
| 10 daL/min | 0.0000016667 m3/ms |
| 60 daL/min | 0.00001 m3/ms |
| 100 daL/min | 0.0000166667 m3/ms |
| 1,000 daL/min | 0.0001666667 m3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Decaliter per Minutes
1.666667e-7 m3/ms × 6000000 = 1.0000002 daL/min
1.666667e-7 cubic meters per millisecond = 1.0000002 decaliter per minutes.
decaliter per minutes = cubic meters per millisecond × 6000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Decaliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meters per millisecond are in 1 decaliter per minutes?
1 decaliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 cubic meters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert decaliter per minutes to cubic meter per millisecond?
Multiply the decaliter per minutes value by 1.666667e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per millisecond back to decaliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 6,000,000 decaliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a decaliter per minutes?
Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per millisecond?
Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the decaliter per minutes to cubic meter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both decaliter per minutes and cubic meter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.666667e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.