Volumetric flow rate.
Decaliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — daL/min to imp qt/wk
Convert Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 decaliter per minutes = 88,691.60091 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Decaliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0001666666667 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Decaliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks
Decaliter per Minutes and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = decaliter per minutes × 88691.6009142
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 decaliter per minutes equals 0.000166666666667 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct decaliter per minutes-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 88691.6009142.
Simple example
1 daL/min × 88691.60091 = 88,691.60091 imp qt/wk
1 decaliter per minutes = 88,691.60091 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 daL/min × 88691.60091 = 5,321,496.055 imp qt/wk
60 decaliter per minutes = 5,321,496.055 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 daL/min | 8,869.160091 imp qt/wk |
| 1 daL/min | 88,691.60091 imp qt/wk |
| 10 daL/min | 886,916.0091 imp qt/wk |
| 60 daL/min | 5,321,496.055 imp qt/wk |
| 100 daL/min | 8,869,160.091 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 daL/min | 88,691,600.91 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Decaliter per Minutes
1 imp qt/wk × 0.0000112750248 = 0.000011275 daL/min
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.000011275 decaliter per minutes.
decaliter per minutes = imperial quart per weeks × 0.0000112750248016
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Decaliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 decaliter per minutes?
1 decaliter per minutes equals 88,691.60091 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert decaliter per minutes to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the decaliter per minutes value by 88691.60091. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to decaliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.000011275 decaliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a decaliter per minutes?
Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the decaliter per minutes to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both decaliter per minutes and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 88691.60091 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.