Volumetric flow rate.
Decaliter per Weeks to Centiliters per Millisecond Converter — daL/wk to cL/ms
Convert Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) to Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 decaliter per weeks = 0.0000016534 centiliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Decaliter per Weeks to Centiliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-8 / 0.01.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Decaliter per Weeks to Centiliters per Millisecond
Decaliter per Weeks and Centiliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per millisecond = decaliter per weeks × 0.00000165343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 decaliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-8 base units, and 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct decaliter per weeks-to-centiliter per millisecond factor of 0.00000165343915344.
Simple example
1 daL/wk × 0.000001653439153 = 0.0000016534 cL/ms
1 decaliter per weeks = 0.0000016534 centiliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 daL/wk × 0.000001653439153 = 0.0000992063 cL/ms
60 decaliter per weeks = 0.0000992063 centiliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) | Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 daL/wk | 1.653439e-7 cL/ms |
| 1 daL/wk | 0.0000016534 cL/ms |
| 10 daL/wk | 0.0000165344 cL/ms |
| 60 daL/wk | 0.0000992063 cL/ms |
| 100 daL/wk | 0.0001653439 cL/ms |
| 1,000 daL/wk | 0.0016534392 cL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Millisecond to Decaliter per Weeks
0.0000016534 cL/ms × 604800 = 0.99997632 daL/wk
0.0000016534 centiliters per millisecond = 0.99997632 decaliter per weeks.
decaliter per weeks = centiliters per millisecond × 604800
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Millisecond to Decaliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per millisecond are in 1 decaliter per weeks?
1 decaliter per weeks equals 0.0000016534 centiliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert decaliter per weeks to centiliter per millisecond?
Multiply the decaliter per weeks value by 0.000001653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond back to decaliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 604,800 decaliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a decaliter per weeks?
Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the decaliter per weeks to centiliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both decaliter per weeks and centiliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.