Volumetric flow rate.
Decaliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours Converter — daL/wk to cm3/h
Convert Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 decaliter per weeks = 59.52380952 cubic centimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Decaliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-8 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Decaliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
Decaliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per hours = decaliter per weeks × 59.5238095238
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 decaliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-8 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct decaliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per hours factor of 59.5238095238.
Simple example
1 daL/wk × 59.52380952 = 59.52380952 cm3/h
1 decaliter per weeks = 59.52380952 cubic centimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 daL/wk × 59.52380952 = 3,571.428571 cm3/h
60 decaliter per weeks = 3,571.428571 cubic centimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 daL/wk | 5.952380952 cm3/h |
| 1 daL/wk | 59.52380952 cm3/h |
| 10 daL/wk | 595.2380952 cm3/h |
| 60 daL/wk | 3,571.428571 cm3/h |
| 100 daL/wk | 5,952.380952 cm3/h |
| 1,000 daL/wk | 59,523.80952 cm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Decaliter per Weeks
59.52380952 cm3/h × 0.0168 = 0.9999999999 daL/wk
59.52380952 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.9999999999 decaliter per weeks.
decaliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per hours × 0.0168
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Decaliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per hours are in 1 decaliter per weeks?
1 decaliter per weeks equals 59.52380952 cubic centimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert decaliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per hours?
Multiply the decaliter per weeks value by 59.52380952. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours back to decaliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 0.0168 decaliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a decaliter per weeks?
Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the decaliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both decaliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 59.52380952 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.