Volumetric flow rate.
Decaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Minutes Converter — daL/wk to imp qt/min
Convert Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) to Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 decaliter per weeks = 0.0008728938 imperial quart per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Decaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-8 / 1.89420417e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Decaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Minutes
Decaliter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per minutes = decaliter per weeks × 0.000872893842457
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 decaliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-8 base units, and 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 0.0000189420416667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct decaliter per weeks-to-imperial quart per minutes factor of 0.000872893842457.
Simple example
1 daL/wk × 0.0008728938425 = 0.0008728938 imp qt/min
1 decaliter per weeks = 0.0008728938 imperial quart per minutes.
Real-world example
60 daL/wk × 0.0008728938425 = 0.0523736306 imp qt/min
60 decaliter per weeks = 0.0523736306 imperial quart per minutes.
Conversion table
| Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) | Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 daL/wk | 0.0000872894 imp qt/min |
| 1 daL/wk | 0.0008728938 imp qt/min |
| 10 daL/wk | 0.0087289384 imp qt/min |
| 60 daL/wk | 0.0523736306 imp qt/min |
| 100 daL/wk | 0.0872893843 imp qt/min |
| 1,000 daL/wk | 0.8728938425 imp qt/min |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Minutes to Decaliter per Weeks
0.0008728938 imp qt/min × 1145.61468 = 0.9999999514 daL/wk
0.0008728938 imperial quart per minutes = 0.9999999514 decaliter per weeks.
decaliter per weeks = imperial quart per minutes × 1145.61468
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Minutes to Decaliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per minutes are in 1 decaliter per weeks?
1 decaliter per weeks equals 0.0008728938 imperial quart per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert decaliter per weeks to imperial quart per minutes?
Multiply the decaliter per weeks value by 0.0008728938425. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per minutes back to decaliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 1,145.61468 decaliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a decaliter per weeks?
Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per minutes?
Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the decaliter per weeks to imperial quart per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both decaliter per weeks and imperial quart per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0008728938425 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.