Volumetric flow rate.
Decaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds Converter — daL/wk to imp qt/s
Convert Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) to Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 decaliter per weeks = 0.0000145482 imperial quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Decaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-8 / 0.0011365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Decaliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds
Decaliter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per seconds = decaliter per weeks × 0.0000145482307076
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 decaliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-8 base units, and 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct decaliter per weeks-to-imperial quart per seconds factor of 0.0000145482307076.
Simple example
1 daL/wk × 0.00001454823071 = 0.0000145482 imp qt/s
1 decaliter per weeks = 0.0000145482 imperial quart per seconds.
Real-world example
60 daL/wk × 0.00001454823071 = 0.0008728938 imp qt/s
60 decaliter per weeks = 0.0008728938 imperial quart per seconds.
Conversion table
| Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) | Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 daL/wk | 0.0000014548 imp qt/s |
| 1 daL/wk | 0.0000145482 imp qt/s |
| 10 daL/wk | 0.0001454823 imp qt/s |
| 60 daL/wk | 0.0008728938 imp qt/s |
| 100 daL/wk | 0.0014548231 imp qt/s |
| 1,000 daL/wk | 0.0145482307 imp qt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Seconds to Decaliter per Weeks
0.0000145482 imp qt/s × 68736.8808 = 0.9999978893 daL/wk
0.0000145482 imperial quart per seconds = 0.9999978893 decaliter per weeks.
decaliter per weeks = imperial quart per seconds × 68736.8808
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Seconds to Decaliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per seconds are in 1 decaliter per weeks?
1 decaliter per weeks equals 0.0000145482 imperial quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert decaliter per weeks to imperial quart per seconds?
Multiply the decaliter per weeks value by 0.00001454823071. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds back to decaliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 68,736.8808 decaliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a decaliter per weeks?
Decaliter per Weeks (daL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the decaliter per weeks to imperial quart per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both decaliter per weeks and imperial quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001454823071 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.