Volumetric flow rate.
Deciliters per Fortnight to Microliters per Millisecond Converter — dL/fn to uL/ms
Convert Deciliter per Fortnight (dL/fn) to Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 deciliter per fortnight = 0.000082672 microliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Deciliters per Fortnight to Microliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-11 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Deciliters per Fortnight to Microliters per Millisecond
Deciliter per Fortnight and Microliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliters per millisecond = deciliters per fortnight × 0.000082671957672
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 deciliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-11 base units, and 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct deciliter per fortnight-to-microliter per millisecond factor of 0.000082671957672.
Simple example
1 dL/fn × 0.00008267195767 = 0.000082672 uL/ms
1 deciliter per fortnight = 0.000082672 microliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 dL/fn × 0.00008267195767 = 0.0049603175 uL/ms
60 deciliters per fortnight = 0.0049603175 microliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Deciliter per Fortnight (dL/fn) | Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 dL/fn | 0.0000082672 uL/ms |
| 1 dL/fn | 0.000082672 uL/ms |
| 10 dL/fn | 0.0008267196 uL/ms |
| 60 dL/fn | 0.0049603175 uL/ms |
| 100 dL/fn | 0.0082671958 uL/ms |
| 1,000 dL/fn | 0.0826719577 uL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Millisecond to Deciliter per Fortnight
0.000082672 uL/ms × 12096 = 1.000000512 dL/fn
0.000082672 microliters per millisecond = 1.000000512 deciliters per fortnight.
deciliters per fortnight = microliters per millisecond × 12096
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Millisecond to Deciliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Deciliter per Fortnight (dL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliters per millisecond are in 1 deciliter per fortnight?
1 deciliter per fortnight equals 0.000082672 microliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert deciliter per fortnight to microliter per millisecond?
Multiply the deciliter per fortnight value by 0.00008267195767. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per millisecond back to deciliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per millisecond equals 12,096 deciliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a deciliter per fortnight?
Deciliter per Fortnight (dL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per millisecond?
Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the deciliter per fortnight to microliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both deciliter per fortnight and microliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00008267195767 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.