Volumetric flow rate.
Deciliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — dL/wk to mm3/ms
Convert Deciliter per Weeks (dL/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 deciliter per weeks = 0.0001653439 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Deciliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-10 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Deciliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Deciliter per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = deciliter per weeks × 0.000165343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 deciliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-10 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct deciliter per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 0.000165343915344.
Simple example
1 dL/wk × 0.0001653439153 = 0.0001653439 mm3/ms
1 deciliter per weeks = 0.0001653439 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 dL/wk × 0.0001653439153 = 0.0099206349 mm3/ms
60 deciliter per weeks = 0.0099206349 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Deciliter per Weeks (dL/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 dL/wk | 0.0000165344 mm3/ms |
| 1 dL/wk | 0.0001653439 mm3/ms |
| 10 dL/wk | 0.0016534392 mm3/ms |
| 60 dL/wk | 0.0099206349 mm3/ms |
| 100 dL/wk | 0.0165343915 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 dL/wk | 0.1653439153 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Deciliter per Weeks
0.0001653439 mm3/ms × 6048 = 0.9999999072 dL/wk
0.0001653439 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 0.9999999072 deciliter per weeks.
deciliter per weeks = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 6048
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Deciliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Deciliter per Weeks (dL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 deciliter per weeks?
1 deciliter per weeks equals 0.0001653439 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert deciliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the deciliter per weeks value by 0.0001653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to deciliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 6,048 deciliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a deciliter per weeks?
Deciliter per Weeks (dL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the deciliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both deciliter per weeks and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0001653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.