Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Days to Cubic Meters per Millisecond Converter — fl oz/d to m3/ms
Convert Fluid ounce per Days (fl oz/d) to Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per days = 3.422862e-13 cubic meter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Days to Cubic Meters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.42286222e-10 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Days to Cubic Meters per Millisecond
Fluid ounce per Days and Cubic Meter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meters per millisecond = fluid ounce per days × 3.422862e-13
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per days equals 3.422862e-10 base units, and 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per days-to-cubic meter per millisecond factor of 3.422862e-13.
Simple example
1 fl oz/d × 3.422862e-13 = 3.422862e-13 m3/ms
1 fluid ounce per days = 3.422862e-13 cubic meters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/d × 3.422862e-13 = 2.053717e-11 m3/ms
60 fluid ounce per days = 2.053717e-11 cubic meters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Days (fl oz/d) | Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/d | 3.422862e-14 m3/ms |
| 1 fl oz/d | 3.422862e-13 m3/ms |
| 10 fl oz/d | 3.422862e-12 m3/ms |
| 60 fl oz/d | 2.053717e-11 m3/ms |
| 100 fl oz/d | 3.422862e-11 m3/ms |
| 1,000 fl oz/d | 3.422862e-10 m3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Days
3.422862e-13 m3/ms × 2.921532e+12 = 0.9999999363 fl oz/d
3.422862e-13 cubic meters per millisecond = 0.9999999363 fluid ounce per days.
fluid ounce per days = cubic meters per millisecond × 2.921532e+12
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Days.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Days (fl oz/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meters per millisecond are in 1 fluid ounce per days?
1 fluid ounce per days equals 3.422862e-13 cubic meters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per days to cubic meter per millisecond?
Multiply the fluid ounce per days value by 3.422862e-13. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per millisecond back to fluid ounce per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 2.921532e+12 fluid ounce per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per days?
Fluid ounce per Days (fl oz/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per millisecond?
Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per days to cubic meter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per days and cubic meter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.422862e-13 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.