Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Decades to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — fl oz/decade to cL/s
Convert Fluid ounce per Decades (fl oz/decade) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per decades = 9.371478e-9 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Decades to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 9.37147845e-14 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Decades to Centiliter per Seconds
Fluid ounce per Decades and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = fluid ounce per decades × 9.371478e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per decades equals 9.371478e-14 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per decades-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 9.371478e-9.
Simple example
1 fl oz/decade × 9.371478e-9 = 9.371478e-9 cL/s
1 fluid ounce per decades = 9.371478e-9 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/decade × 9.371478e-9 = 5.622887e-7 cL/s
60 fluid ounce per decades = 5.622887e-7 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Decades (fl oz/decade) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/decade | 9.371478e-10 cL/s |
| 1 fl oz/decade | 9.371478e-9 cL/s |
| 10 fl oz/decade | 9.371478e-8 cL/s |
| 60 fl oz/decade | 5.622887e-7 cL/s |
| 100 fl oz/decade | 9.371478e-7 cL/s |
| 1,000 fl oz/decade | 0.0000093715 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Decades
9.371478e-9 cL/s × 106706749.1 = 0.999999952 fl oz/decade
9.371478e-9 centiliter per seconds = 0.999999952 fluid ounce per decades.
fluid ounce per decades = centiliter per seconds × 106706749.133
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Decades.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Decades (fl oz/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 fluid ounce per decades?
1 fluid ounce per decades equals 9.371478e-9 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per decades to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the fluid ounce per decades value by 9.371478e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to fluid ounce per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 106,706,749.1 fluid ounce per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per decades?
Fluid ounce per Decades (fl oz/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per decades to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per decades and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 9.371478e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.