Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Hours to Fluid ounces per Millisecond Converter — fl oz/h to fl oz/ms
Convert Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) to Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per hours = 2.777778e-7 fluid ounce per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Hours to Fluid ounces per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.21486932e-9 / 0.02957352956.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Hours to Fluid ounces per Millisecond
Fluid ounce per Hours and Fluid ounce per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounces per millisecond = fluid ounce per hours × 2.777778e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per hours equals 8.214869e-9 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0295735295625 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per hours-to-fluid ounce per millisecond factor of 2.777778e-7.
Simple example
1 fl oz/h × 2.777778e-7 = 2.777778e-7 fl oz/ms
1 fluid ounce per hours = 2.777778e-7 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/h × 2.777778e-7 = 0.0000166667 fl oz/ms
60 fluid ounce per hours = 0.0000166667 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) | Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/h | 2.777778e-8 fl oz/ms |
| 1 fl oz/h | 2.777778e-7 fl oz/ms |
| 10 fl oz/h | 0.0000027778 fl oz/ms |
| 60 fl oz/h | 0.0000166667 fl oz/ms |
| 100 fl oz/h | 0.0000277778 fl oz/ms |
| 1,000 fl oz/h | 0.0002777778 fl oz/ms |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Hours
2.777778e-7 fl oz/ms × 3600000 = 1.00000008 fl oz/h
2.777778e-7 fluid ounces per millisecond = 1.00000008 fluid ounce per hours.
fluid ounce per hours = fluid ounces per millisecond × 3600000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Hours.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounces per millisecond are in 1 fluid ounce per hours?
1 fluid ounce per hours equals 2.777778e-7 fluid ounces per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per hours to fluid ounce per millisecond?
Multiply the fluid ounce per hours value by 2.777778e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per millisecond back to fluid ounce per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 3,600,000 fluid ounce per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per hours?
Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per millisecond?
Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per hours to fluid ounce per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per hours and fluid ounce per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.777778e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.