Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounces per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds Converter — fl oz/ms to bu/s
Convert Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) to Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per millisecond = 0.8392255931 bushel per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounces per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.02957352956 / 0.03523907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounces per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds
Fluid ounce per Millisecond and Bushel per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per seconds = fluid ounces per millisecond × 0.83922559314
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0295735295625 base units, and 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per millisecond-to-bushel per seconds factor of 0.83922559314.
Simple example
1 fl oz/ms × 0.8392255931 = 0.8392255931 bu/s
1 fluid ounce per millisecond = 0.8392255931 bushel per seconds.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/ms × 0.8392255931 = 50.35353559 bu/s
60 fluid ounces per millisecond = 50.35353559 bushel per seconds.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) | Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/ms | 0.0839225593 bu/s |
| 1 fl oz/ms | 0.8392255931 bu/s |
| 10 fl oz/ms | 8.392255931 bu/s |
| 60 fl oz/ms | 50.35353559 bu/s |
| 100 fl oz/ms | 83.92255931 bu/s |
| 1,000 fl oz/ms | 839.2255931 bu/s |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Millisecond
0.8392255931 bu/s × 1.191574719 = 1 fl oz/ms
0.8392255931 bushel per seconds = 1 fluid ounces per millisecond.
fluid ounces per millisecond = bushel per seconds × 1.19157471861
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Millisecond.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per seconds are in 1 fluid ounce per millisecond?
1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.8392255931 bushel per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per millisecond to bushel per seconds?
Multiply the fluid ounce per millisecond value by 0.8392255931. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per seconds back to fluid ounce per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per seconds equals 1.191574719 fluid ounces per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per millisecond?
Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per millisecond to bushel per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per millisecond and bushel per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.8392255931 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.