Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounces per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes Converter — fl oz/ms to hL/min
Convert Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) to Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per millisecond = 17.74411774 hectoliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounces per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.02957352956 / 0.001666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounces per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes
Fluid ounce per Millisecond and Hectoliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
hectoliter per minutes = fluid ounces per millisecond × 17.7441177375
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0295735295625 base units, and 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.00166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per millisecond-to-hectoliter per minutes factor of 17.7441177375.
Simple example
1 fl oz/ms × 17.74411774 = 17.74411774 hL/min
1 fluid ounce per millisecond = 17.74411774 hectoliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/ms × 17.74411774 = 1,064.647064 hL/min
60 fluid ounces per millisecond = 1,064.647064 hectoliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) | Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/ms | 1.774411774 hL/min |
| 1 fl oz/ms | 17.74411774 hL/min |
| 10 fl oz/ms | 177.4411774 hL/min |
| 60 fl oz/ms | 1,064.647064 hL/min |
| 100 fl oz/ms | 1,774.411774 hL/min |
| 1,000 fl oz/ms | 17,744.11774 hL/min |
Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Minutes to Fluid ounce per Millisecond
17.74411774 hL/min × 0.0563567045 = 1 fl oz/ms
17.74411774 hectoliter per minutes = 1 fluid ounces per millisecond.
fluid ounces per millisecond = hectoliter per minutes × 0.0563567045031
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Minutes to Fluid ounce per Millisecond.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many hectoliter per minutes are in 1 fluid ounce per millisecond?
1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 17.74411774 hectoliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per millisecond to hectoliter per minutes?
Multiply the fluid ounce per millisecond value by 17.74411774. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert hectoliter per minutes back to fluid ounce per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.0563567045 fluid ounces per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per millisecond?
Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a hectoliter per minutes?
Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per millisecond to hectoliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per millisecond and hectoliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 17.74411774 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.