Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounces per Millisecond to Microliter per Seconds Converter — fl oz/ms to uL/s
Convert Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) to Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per millisecond = 29,573,529.56 microliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounces per Millisecond to Microliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.02957352956 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounces per Millisecond to Microliter per Seconds
Fluid ounce per Millisecond and Microliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliter per seconds = fluid ounces per millisecond × 29573529.5625
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0295735295625 base units, and 1 microliter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per millisecond-to-microliter per seconds factor of 29573529.5625.
Simple example
1 fl oz/ms × 29573529.56 = 29,573,529.56 uL/s
1 fluid ounce per millisecond = 29,573,529.56 microliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/ms × 29573529.56 = 1,774,411,774 uL/s
60 fluid ounces per millisecond = 1,774,411,774 microliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) | Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/ms | 2,957,352.956 uL/s |
| 1 fl oz/ms | 29,573,529.56 uL/s |
| 10 fl oz/ms | 295,735,295.6 uL/s |
| 60 fl oz/ms | 1,774,411,774 uL/s |
| 100 fl oz/ms | 2,957,352,956 uL/s |
| 1,000 fl oz/ms | 29,573,529,560 uL/s |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Millisecond
1 uL/s × 3.381402e-8 = 3.381402e-8 fl oz/ms
1 microliter per seconds = 3.381402e-8 fluid ounces per millisecond.
fluid ounces per millisecond = microliter per seconds × 3.381402e-8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Millisecond.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Seconds (uL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliter per seconds are in 1 fluid ounce per millisecond?
1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 29,573,529.56 microliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per millisecond to microliter per seconds?
Multiply the fluid ounce per millisecond value by 29573529.56. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per seconds back to fluid ounce per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per seconds equals 3.381402e-8 fluid ounces per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per millisecond?
Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per seconds?
Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per millisecond to microliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per millisecond and microliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 29573529.56 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.