Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks Converter — fl oz/s to cm3/wk
Convert Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per seconds = 17,886,070.68 cubic centimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.95735296e-5 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
Fluid ounce per Seconds and Cubic Centimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per weeks = fluid ounce per seconds × 17886070.6794
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 0.0000295735295625 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per seconds-to-cubic centimeter per weeks factor of 17886070.6794.
Simple example
1 fl oz/s × 17886070.68 = 17,886,070.68 cm3/wk
1 fluid ounce per seconds = 17,886,070.68 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/s × 17886070.68 = 1,073,164,241 cm3/wk
60 fluid ounce per seconds = 1,073,164,241 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) | Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/s | 1,788,607.068 cm3/wk |
| 1 fl oz/s | 17,886,070.68 cm3/wk |
| 10 fl oz/s | 178,860,706.8 cm3/wk |
| 60 fl oz/s | 1,073,164,241 cm3/wk |
| 100 fl oz/s | 1,788,607,068 cm3/wk |
| 1,000 fl oz/s | 17,886,070,680 cm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Seconds
1 cm3/wk × 5.590943e-8 = 5.590943e-8 fl oz/s
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 5.590943e-8 fluid ounce per seconds.
fluid ounce per seconds = cubic centimeter per weeks × 5.590943e-8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Seconds.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per weeks are in 1 fluid ounce per seconds?
1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 17,886,070.68 cubic centimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per seconds to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Multiply the fluid ounce per seconds value by 17886070.68. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks back to fluid ounce per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 5.590943e-8 fluid ounce per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per seconds?
Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per seconds to cubic centimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per seconds and cubic centimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 17886070.68 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.