Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks Converter — fl oz/s to ft3/wk
Convert Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) to Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per seconds = 631.640625 cubic foot per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.95735296e-5 / 4.68201829e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks
Fluid ounce per Seconds and Cubic foot per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per weeks = fluid ounce per seconds × 631.640625
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 0.0000295735295625 base units, and 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per seconds-to-cubic foot per weeks factor of 631.640625.
Simple example
1 fl oz/s × 631.640625 = 631.640625 ft3/wk
1 fluid ounce per seconds = 631.640625 cubic foot per weeks.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/s × 631.640625 = 37,898.4375 ft3/wk
60 fluid ounce per seconds = 37,898.4375 cubic foot per weeks.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) | Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/s | 63.1640625 ft3/wk |
| 1 fl oz/s | 631.640625 ft3/wk |
| 10 fl oz/s | 6,316.40625 ft3/wk |
| 60 fl oz/s | 37,898.4375 ft3/wk |
| 100 fl oz/s | 63,164.0625 ft3/wk |
| 1,000 fl oz/s | 631,640.625 ft3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Seconds
631.640625 ft3/wk × 0.001583178726 = 1 fl oz/s
631.640625 cubic foot per weeks = 1 fluid ounce per seconds.
fluid ounce per seconds = cubic foot per weeks × 0.00158317872604
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Seconds.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per weeks are in 1 fluid ounce per seconds?
1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 631.640625 cubic foot per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per seconds to cubic foot per weeks?
Multiply the fluid ounce per seconds value by 631.640625. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks back to fluid ounce per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.0015831787 fluid ounce per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per seconds?
Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per seconds to cubic foot per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per seconds and cubic foot per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 631.640625 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.