Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — fl oz/s to mm3/s
Convert Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per seconds = 29,573.52956 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.95735296e-5 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Fluid ounce per Seconds and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = fluid ounce per seconds × 29573.5295625
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 0.0000295735295625 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per seconds-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 29573.5295625.
Simple example
1 fl oz/s × 29573.52956 = 29,573.52956 mm3/s
1 fluid ounce per seconds = 29,573.52956 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/s × 29573.52956 = 1,774,411.774 mm3/s
60 fluid ounce per seconds = 1,774,411.774 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/s | 2,957.352956 mm3/s |
| 1 fl oz/s | 29,573.52956 mm3/s |
| 10 fl oz/s | 295,735.2956 mm3/s |
| 60 fl oz/s | 1,774,411.774 mm3/s |
| 100 fl oz/s | 2,957,352.956 mm3/s |
| 1,000 fl oz/s | 29,573,529.56 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Seconds
1 mm3/s × 0.0000338140227 = 0.000033814 fl oz/s
1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.000033814 fluid ounce per seconds.
fluid ounce per seconds = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.0000338140227018
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Seconds.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 fluid ounce per seconds?
1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 29,573.52956 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per seconds to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the fluid ounce per seconds value by 29573.52956. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to fluid ounce per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.000033814 fluid ounce per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per seconds?
Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per seconds to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per seconds and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 29573.52956 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.