Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Microliters per Millisecond Converter — fl oz/s to uL/ms
Convert Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) to Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per seconds = 29.57352956 microliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Microliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.95735296e-5 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Seconds to Microliters per Millisecond
Fluid ounce per Seconds and Microliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliters per millisecond = fluid ounce per seconds × 29.5735295625
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 0.0000295735295625 base units, and 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per seconds-to-microliter per millisecond factor of 29.5735295625.
Simple example
1 fl oz/s × 29.57352956 = 29.57352956 uL/ms
1 fluid ounce per seconds = 29.57352956 microliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/s × 29.57352956 = 1,774.411774 uL/ms
60 fluid ounce per seconds = 1,774.411774 microliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) | Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/s | 2.957352956 uL/ms |
| 1 fl oz/s | 29.57352956 uL/ms |
| 10 fl oz/s | 295.7352956 uL/ms |
| 60 fl oz/s | 1,774.411774 uL/ms |
| 100 fl oz/s | 2,957.352956 uL/ms |
| 1,000 fl oz/s | 29,573.52956 uL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Seconds
29.57352956 uL/ms × 0.0338140227 = 0.9999999999 fl oz/s
29.57352956 microliters per millisecond = 0.9999999999 fluid ounce per seconds.
fluid ounce per seconds = microliters per millisecond × 0.0338140227018
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Seconds.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliters per millisecond are in 1 fluid ounce per seconds?
1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 29.57352956 microliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per seconds to microliter per millisecond?
Multiply the fluid ounce per seconds value by 29.57352956. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per millisecond back to fluid ounce per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.0338140227 fluid ounce per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per seconds?
Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per millisecond?
Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per seconds to microliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per seconds and microliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 29.57352956 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.