Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — fl oz/s to imp qt/wk
Convert Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per seconds = 15,737.54209 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.95735296e-5 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks
Fluid ounce per Seconds and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = fluid ounce per seconds × 15737.5420895
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 0.0000295735295625 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per seconds-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 15737.5420895.
Simple example
1 fl oz/s × 15737.54209 = 15,737.54209 imp qt/wk
1 fluid ounce per seconds = 15,737.54209 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/s × 15737.54209 = 944,252.5254 imp qt/wk
60 fluid ounce per seconds = 944,252.5254 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/s | 1,573.754209 imp qt/wk |
| 1 fl oz/s | 15,737.54209 imp qt/wk |
| 10 fl oz/s | 157,375.4209 imp qt/wk |
| 60 fl oz/s | 944,252.5254 imp qt/wk |
| 100 fl oz/s | 1,573,754.209 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 fl oz/s | 15,737,542.09 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Seconds
1 imp qt/wk × 0.0000635423241 = 0.0000635423 fl oz/s
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0000635423 fluid ounce per seconds.
fluid ounce per seconds = imperial quart per weeks × 0.0000635423241008
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Seconds.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 fluid ounce per seconds?
1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 15,737.54209 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per seconds to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the fluid ounce per seconds value by 15737.54209. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to fluid ounce per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0000635423 fluid ounce per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per seconds?
Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per seconds to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per seconds and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 15737.54209 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.