Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — fl oz/wk to cL/s
Convert Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.0000048898 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.88980317e-11 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds
Fluid ounce per Weeks and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = fluid ounce per weeks × 0.0000048898031684
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per weeks-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 0.0000048898031684.
Simple example
1 fl oz/wk × 0.000004889803168 = 0.0000048898 cL/s
1 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.0000048898 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/wk × 0.000004889803168 = 0.0002933882 cL/s
60 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.0002933882 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/wk | 4.889803e-7 cL/s |
| 1 fl oz/wk | 0.0000048898 cL/s |
| 10 fl oz/wk | 0.000048898 cL/s |
| 60 fl oz/wk | 0.0002933882 cL/s |
| 100 fl oz/wk | 0.0004889803 cL/s |
| 1,000 fl oz/wk | 0.0048898032 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Weeks
0.0000048898 cL/s × 204507.2093 = 0.999999352 fl oz/wk
0.0000048898 centiliter per seconds = 0.999999352 fluid ounce per weeks.
fluid ounce per weeks = centiliter per seconds × 204507.209301
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Weeks.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 fluid ounce per weeks?
1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 0.0000048898 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the fluid ounce per weeks value by 0.000004889803168. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to fluid ounce per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 204,507.2093 fluid ounce per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per weeks to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per weeks and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000004889803168 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.