Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Days Converter — fl oz/wk to cm3/d
Convert Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per weeks = 4.224789937 cubic centimeter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.88980317e-11 / 1.15740741e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Days
Fluid ounce per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per days = fluid ounce per weeks × 4.2247899375
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per days equals 1.157407e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per days factor of 4.2247899375.
Simple example
1 fl oz/wk × 4.224789937 = 4.224789937 cm3/d
1 fluid ounce per weeks = 4.224789937 cubic centimeter per days.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/wk × 4.224789937 = 253.4873962 cm3/d
60 fluid ounce per weeks = 253.4873962 cubic centimeter per days.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/wk | 0.4224789937 cm3/d |
| 1 fl oz/wk | 4.224789937 cm3/d |
| 10 fl oz/wk | 42.24789937 cm3/d |
| 60 fl oz/wk | 253.4873962 cm3/d |
| 100 fl oz/wk | 422.4789937 cm3/d |
| 1,000 fl oz/wk | 4,224.789937 cm3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Days to Fluid ounce per Weeks
4.224789937 cm3/d × 0.2366981589 = 0.9999999999 fl oz/wk
4.224789937 cubic centimeter per days = 0.9999999999 fluid ounce per weeks.
fluid ounce per weeks = cubic centimeter per days × 0.236698158913
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Days to Fluid ounce per Weeks.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per days are in 1 fluid ounce per weeks?
1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.224789937 cubic centimeter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks to cubic centimeter per days?
Multiply the fluid ounce per weeks value by 4.224789937. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per days back to fluid ounce per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per days equals 0.2366981589 fluid ounce per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per days?
Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per weeks to cubic centimeter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per weeks and cubic centimeter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.224789937 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.