Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Liters per Millisecond Converter — fl oz/wk to L/ms
Convert Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) to Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per weeks = 4.889803e-11 liter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Liters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.88980317e-11 / 1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Weeks to Liters per Millisecond
Fluid ounce per Weeks and Liter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
liters per millisecond = fluid ounce per weeks × 4.889803e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, and 1 liter per millisecond equals 1 base unit, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per weeks-to-liter per millisecond factor of 4.889803e-11.
Simple example
1 fl oz/wk × 4.889803e-11 = 4.889803e-11 L/ms
1 fluid ounce per weeks = 4.889803e-11 liters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/wk × 4.889803e-11 = 2.933882e-9 L/ms
60 fluid ounce per weeks = 2.933882e-9 liters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) | Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/wk | 4.889803e-12 L/ms |
| 1 fl oz/wk | 4.889803e-11 L/ms |
| 10 fl oz/wk | 4.889803e-10 L/ms |
| 60 fl oz/wk | 2.933882e-9 L/ms |
| 100 fl oz/wk | 4.889803e-9 L/ms |
| 1,000 fl oz/wk | 4.889803e-8 L/ms |
Reverse conversion: Liter per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Weeks
4.889803e-11 L/ms × 20450720930 = 0.9999999656 fl oz/wk
4.889803e-11 liters per millisecond = 0.9999999656 fluid ounce per weeks.
fluid ounce per weeks = liters per millisecond × 20450720930.1
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Liter per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Weeks.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Liter per Millisecond (L/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many liters per millisecond are in 1 fluid ounce per weeks?
1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 liters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks to liter per millisecond?
Multiply the fluid ounce per weeks value by 4.889803e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert liter per millisecond back to fluid ounce per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 liter per millisecond equals 20,450,720,930 fluid ounce per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a liter per millisecond?
Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per weeks to liter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per weeks and liter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.889803e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.