Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Milliliter per Weeks Converter — fl oz/wk to mL/wk
Convert Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) to Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per weeks = 29.57352956 milliliter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Milliliter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.88980317e-11 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Weeks to Milliliter per Weeks
Fluid ounce per Weeks and Milliliter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per weeks = fluid ounce per weeks × 29.5735295625
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, and 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per weeks-to-milliliter per weeks factor of 29.5735295625.
Simple example
1 fl oz/wk × 29.57352956 = 29.57352956 mL/wk
1 fluid ounce per weeks = 29.57352956 milliliter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/wk × 29.57352956 = 1,774.411774 mL/wk
60 fluid ounce per weeks = 1,774.411774 milliliter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) | Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/wk | 2.957352956 mL/wk |
| 1 fl oz/wk | 29.57352956 mL/wk |
| 10 fl oz/wk | 295.7352956 mL/wk |
| 60 fl oz/wk | 1,774.411774 mL/wk |
| 100 fl oz/wk | 2,957.352956 mL/wk |
| 1,000 fl oz/wk | 29,573.52956 mL/wk |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Weeks
29.57352956 mL/wk × 0.0338140227 = 0.9999999999 fl oz/wk
29.57352956 milliliter per weeks = 0.9999999999 fluid ounce per weeks.
fluid ounce per weeks = milliliter per weeks × 0.0338140227018
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Weeks.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per weeks are in 1 fluid ounce per weeks?
1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 29.57352956 milliliter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks to milliliter per weeks?
Multiply the fluid ounce per weeks value by 29.57352956. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks back to fluid ounce per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.0338140227 fluid ounce per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per weeks to milliliter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per weeks and milliliter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 29.57352956 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.