Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — fl oz/wk to imp qt/h
Convert Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.0001548873 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.88980317e-11 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours
Fluid ounce per Weeks and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = fluid ounce per weeks × 0.000154887311129
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per weeks-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 0.000154887311129.
Simple example
1 fl oz/wk × 0.0001548873111 = 0.0001548873 imp qt/h
1 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.0001548873 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/wk × 0.0001548873111 = 0.0092932387 imp qt/h
60 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.0092932387 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/wk | 0.0000154887 imp qt/h |
| 1 fl oz/wk | 0.0001548873 imp qt/h |
| 10 fl oz/wk | 0.0015488731 imp qt/h |
| 60 fl oz/wk | 0.0092932387 imp qt/h |
| 100 fl oz/wk | 0.0154887311 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 fl oz/wk | 0.1548873111 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Fluid ounce per Weeks
0.0001548873 imp qt/h × 6456.3068 = 0.9999999281 fl oz/wk
0.0001548873 imperial quart per hours = 0.9999999281 fluid ounce per weeks.
fluid ounce per weeks = imperial quart per hours × 6456.30679951
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Fluid ounce per Weeks.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 fluid ounce per weeks?
1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 0.0001548873 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the fluid ounce per weeks value by 0.0001548873111. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to fluid ounce per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 6,456.3068 fluid ounce per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per weeks to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per weeks and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0001548873111 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.