Volumetric flow rate.
Gallon per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — gal/decade to cm3/s
Convert Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 gallon per decades = 0.0000119955 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Gallon per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.19954924e-11 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Gallon per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Gallon per Decades and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = gallon per decades × 0.0000119954924164
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 gallon per decades equals 1.199549e-11 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct gallon per decades-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 0.0000119954924164.
Simple example
1 gal/decade × 0.00001199549242 = 0.0000119955 cm3/s
1 gallon per decades = 0.0000119955 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 gal/decade × 0.00001199549242 = 0.0007197295 cm3/s
60 gallon per decades = 0.0007197295 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 gal/decade | 0.0000011995 cm3/s |
| 1 gal/decade | 0.0000119955 cm3/s |
| 10 gal/decade | 0.0001199549 cm3/s |
| 60 gal/decade | 0.0007197295 cm3/s |
| 100 gal/decade | 0.0011995492 cm3/s |
| 1,000 gal/decade | 0.0119954924 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Gallon per Decades
0.0000119955 cm3/s × 83364.64776 = 1.000000632 gal/decade
0.0000119955 cubic centimeter per seconds = 1.000000632 gallon per decades.
gallon per decades = cubic centimeter per seconds × 83364.6477601
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Gallon per Decades.
Understanding the Gallon per Decades (gal/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 gallon per decades?
1 gallon per decades equals 0.0000119955 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert gallon per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the gallon per decades value by 0.00001199549242. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to gallon per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 83,364.64776 gallon per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a gallon per decades?
Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the gallon per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both gallon per decades and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001199549242 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.