Volumetric flow rate.
Gallon per Decades to Microliters per Millisecond Converter — gal/decade to uL/ms
Convert Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) to Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 gallon per decades = 0.0000119955 microliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Gallon per Decades to Microliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.19954924e-11 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Gallon per Decades to Microliters per Millisecond
Gallon per Decades and Microliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliters per millisecond = gallon per decades × 0.0000119954924164
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 gallon per decades equals 1.199549e-11 base units, and 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct gallon per decades-to-microliter per millisecond factor of 0.0000119954924164.
Simple example
1 gal/decade × 0.00001199549242 = 0.0000119955 uL/ms
1 gallon per decades = 0.0000119955 microliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 gal/decade × 0.00001199549242 = 0.0007197295 uL/ms
60 gallon per decades = 0.0007197295 microliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) | Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 gal/decade | 0.0000011995 uL/ms |
| 1 gal/decade | 0.0000119955 uL/ms |
| 10 gal/decade | 0.0001199549 uL/ms |
| 60 gal/decade | 0.0007197295 uL/ms |
| 100 gal/decade | 0.0011995492 uL/ms |
| 1,000 gal/decade | 0.0119954924 uL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Millisecond to Gallon per Decades
0.0000119955 uL/ms × 83364.64776 = 1.000000632 gal/decade
0.0000119955 microliters per millisecond = 1.000000632 gallon per decades.
gallon per decades = microliters per millisecond × 83364.6477601
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Millisecond to Gallon per Decades.
Understanding the Gallon per Decades (gal/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliters per millisecond are in 1 gallon per decades?
1 gallon per decades equals 0.0000119955 microliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert gallon per decades to microliter per millisecond?
Multiply the gallon per decades value by 0.00001199549242. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per millisecond back to gallon per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per millisecond equals 83,364.64776 gallon per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a gallon per decades?
Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per millisecond?
Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the gallon per decades to microliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both gallon per decades and microliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001199549242 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.