Volumetric flow rate.
Gallons per Millisecond to Bushels per Millisecond Converter — gal/ms to bu/ms
Convert Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) to Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 gallon per millisecond = 0.1074208759 bushel per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Gallons per Millisecond to Bushels per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.785411784 / 35.23907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Gallons per Millisecond to Bushels per Millisecond
Gallon per Millisecond and Bushel per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per millisecond = gallons per millisecond × 0.107420875922
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 gallon per millisecond equals 3.785411784 base units, and 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct gallon per millisecond-to-bushel per millisecond factor of 0.107420875922.
Simple example
1 gal/ms × 0.1074208759 = 0.1074208759 bu/ms
1 gallon per millisecond = 0.1074208759 bushels per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 gal/ms × 0.1074208759 = 6.445252555 bu/ms
60 gallons per millisecond = 6.445252555 bushels per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) | Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 gal/ms | 0.0107420876 bu/ms |
| 1 gal/ms | 0.1074208759 bu/ms |
| 10 gal/ms | 1.074208759 bu/ms |
| 60 gal/ms | 6.445252555 bu/ms |
| 100 gal/ms | 10.74208759 bu/ms |
| 1,000 gal/ms | 107.4208759 bu/ms |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Millisecond to Gallon per Millisecond
0.1074208759 bu/ms × 9.309177489 = 0.9999999998 gal/ms
0.1074208759 bushels per millisecond = 0.9999999998 gallons per millisecond.
gallons per millisecond = bushels per millisecond × 9.30917748918
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Millisecond to Gallon per Millisecond.
Understanding the Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per millisecond are in 1 gallon per millisecond?
1 gallon per millisecond equals 0.1074208759 bushels per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert gallon per millisecond to bushel per millisecond?
Multiply the gallon per millisecond value by 0.1074208759. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond back to gallon per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 9.309177489 gallons per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a gallon per millisecond?
Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the gallon per millisecond to bushel per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both gallon per millisecond and bushel per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1074208759 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.