Volumetric flow rate.
Gallons per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes Converter — gal/ms to cm3/min
Convert Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 gallon per millisecond = 227,124,707 cubic centimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Gallons per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.785411784 / 1.66666667e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Gallons per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes
Gallon per Millisecond and Cubic Centimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per minutes = gallons per millisecond × 227124707.04
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 gallon per millisecond equals 3.785411784 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct gallon per millisecond-to-cubic centimeter per minutes factor of 227124707.04.
Simple example
1 gal/ms × 227124707 = 227,124,707 cm3/min
1 gallon per millisecond = 227,124,707 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 gal/ms × 227124707 = 13,627,482,420 cm3/min
60 gallons per millisecond = 13,627,482,420 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) | Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 gal/ms | 22,712,470.7 cm3/min |
| 1 gal/ms | 227,124,707 cm3/min |
| 10 gal/ms | 2,271,247,070 cm3/min |
| 60 gal/ms | 13,627,482,420 cm3/min |
| 100 gal/ms | 22,712,470,700 cm3/min |
| 1,000 gal/ms | 227,124,707,000 cm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Gallon per Millisecond
1 cm3/min × 4.402868e-9 = 4.402868e-9 gal/ms
1 cubic centimeter per minutes = 4.402868e-9 gallons per millisecond.
gallons per millisecond = cubic centimeter per minutes × 4.402868e-9
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Gallon per Millisecond.
Understanding the Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per minutes are in 1 gallon per millisecond?
1 gallon per millisecond equals 227,124,707 cubic centimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert gallon per millisecond to cubic centimeter per minutes?
Multiply the gallon per millisecond value by 227124707. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per minutes back to gallon per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 4.402868e-9 gallons per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a gallon per millisecond?
Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per minutes?
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the gallon per millisecond to cubic centimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both gallon per millisecond and cubic centimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 227124707 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.