Volumetric flow rate.
Gallon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — gal/wk to mm3/ms
Convert Gallon per Weeks (gal/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 gallon per weeks = 0.0062589481 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Gallon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 6.25894806e-9 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Gallon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Gallon per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = gallon per weeks × 0.00625894805556
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 gallon per weeks equals 6.258948e-9 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct gallon per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 0.00625894805556.
Simple example
1 gal/wk × 0.006258948056 = 0.0062589481 mm3/ms
1 gallon per weeks = 0.0062589481 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 gal/wk × 0.006258948056 = 0.3755368833 mm3/ms
60 gallon per weeks = 0.3755368833 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Gallon per Weeks (gal/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 gal/wk | 0.0006258948 mm3/ms |
| 1 gal/wk | 0.0062589481 mm3/ms |
| 10 gal/wk | 0.0625894806 mm3/ms |
| 60 gal/wk | 0.3755368833 mm3/ms |
| 100 gal/wk | 0.6258948056 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 gal/wk | 6.258948056 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Gallon per Weeks
0.0062589481 mm3/ms × 159.7712573 = 1.000000007 gal/wk
0.0062589481 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 1.000000007 gallon per weeks.
gallon per weeks = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 159.771257266
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Gallon per Weeks.
Understanding the Gallon per Weeks (gal/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 gallon per weeks?
1 gallon per weeks equals 0.0062589481 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert gallon per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the gallon per weeks value by 0.006258948056. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to gallon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 159.7712573 gallon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a gallon per weeks?
Gallon per Weeks (gal/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the gallon per weeks to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both gallon per weeks and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.006258948056 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.