Hectoliter per Days to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — hL/d to mL/s

Convert Hectoliter per Days (hL/d) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per days = 1.157407407 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Hectoliter per Days to Milliliter per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 hectoliter per days = 1.157407407 milliliter per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.15740741e-6 / 1e-6.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Hectoliter per Days to Milliliter per Seconds

Hectoliter per Days and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

milliliter per seconds = hectoliter per days × 1.15740740741

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per days equals 0.00000115740740741 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per days-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 1.15740740741.

Simple example

1 hL/d × 1.157407407 = 1.157407407 mL/s

1 hectoliter per days = 1.157407407 milliliter per seconds.

Real-world example

60 hL/d × 1.157407407 = 69.44444444 mL/s

60 hectoliter per days = 69.44444444 milliliter per seconds.

Conversion table

Hectoliter per Days (hL/d)Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
0.1 hL/d0.1157407407 mL/s
1 hL/d1.157407407 mL/s
10 hL/d11.57407407 mL/s
60 hL/d69.44444444 mL/s
100 hL/d115.7407407 mL/s
1,000 hL/d1,157.407407 mL/s

Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Hectoliter per Days

1.157407407 mL/s × 0.864 = 0.9999999996 hL/d

1.157407407 milliliter per seconds = 0.9999999996 hectoliter per days.

hectoliter per days = milliliter per seconds × 0.864

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Hectoliter per Days.

Understanding the Hectoliter per Days (hL/d)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 hectoliter per days?

1 hectoliter per days equals 1.157407407 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert hectoliter per days to milliliter per seconds?

Multiply the hectoliter per days value by 1.157407407. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to hectoliter per days?

Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.864 hectoliter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a hectoliter per days?

Hectoliter per Days (hL/d) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a milliliter per seconds?

Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the hectoliter per days to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both hectoliter per days and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.157407407 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.