Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliters per Fortnight to Centiliters per Millisecond Converter — hL/fn to cL/ms
Convert Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn) to Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per fortnight = 0.0000082672 centiliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliters per Fortnight to Centiliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-8 / 0.01.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliters per Fortnight to Centiliters per Millisecond
Hectoliter per Fortnight and Centiliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per millisecond = hectoliters per fortnight × 0.0000082671957672
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-8 base units, and 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per fortnight-to-centiliter per millisecond factor of 0.0000082671957672.
Simple example
1 hL/fn × 0.000008267195767 = 0.0000082672 cL/ms
1 hectoliter per fortnight = 0.0000082672 centiliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 hL/fn × 0.000008267195767 = 0.0004960317 cL/ms
60 hectoliters per fortnight = 0.0004960317 centiliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn) | Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/fn | 8.267196e-7 cL/ms |
| 1 hL/fn | 0.0000082672 cL/ms |
| 10 hL/fn | 0.000082672 cL/ms |
| 60 hL/fn | 0.0004960317 cL/ms |
| 100 hL/fn | 0.0008267196 cL/ms |
| 1,000 hL/fn | 0.0082671958 cL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Fortnight
0.0000082672 cL/ms × 120960 = 1.000000512 hL/fn
0.0000082672 centiliters per millisecond = 1.000000512 hectoliters per fortnight.
hectoliters per fortnight = centiliters per millisecond × 120960
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per millisecond are in 1 hectoliter per fortnight?
1 hectoliter per fortnight equals 0.0000082672 centiliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per fortnight to centiliter per millisecond?
Multiply the hectoliter per fortnight value by 0.000008267195767. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond back to hectoliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 120,960 hectoliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per fortnight?
Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per fortnight to centiliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per fortnight and centiliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000008267195767 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.