Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliters per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — hL/fn to cL/s
Convert Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per fortnight = 0.0082671958 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliters per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-8 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliters per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds
Hectoliter per Fortnight and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = hectoliters per fortnight × 0.0082671957672
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-8 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per fortnight-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 0.0082671957672.
Simple example
1 hL/fn × 0.008267195767 = 0.0082671958 cL/s
1 hectoliter per fortnight = 0.0082671958 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 hL/fn × 0.008267195767 = 0.496031746 cL/s
60 hectoliters per fortnight = 0.496031746 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/fn | 0.0008267196 cL/s |
| 1 hL/fn | 0.0082671958 cL/s |
| 10 hL/fn | 0.0826719577 cL/s |
| 60 hL/fn | 0.496031746 cL/s |
| 100 hL/fn | 0.8267195767 cL/s |
| 1,000 hL/fn | 8.267195767 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Hectoliter per Fortnight
0.0082671958 cL/s × 120.96 = 1.000000004 hL/fn
0.0082671958 centiliter per seconds = 1.000000004 hectoliters per fortnight.
hectoliters per fortnight = centiliter per seconds × 120.96
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Hectoliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 hectoliter per fortnight?
1 hectoliter per fortnight equals 0.0082671958 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per fortnight to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the hectoliter per fortnight value by 0.008267195767. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to hectoliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 120.96 hectoliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per fortnight?
Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per fortnight to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per fortnight and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.008267195767 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.