Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliters per Fortnight to Megaliters per Millisecond Converter — hL/fn to ML/ms
Convert Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn) to Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per fortnight = 8.267196e-14 megaliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliters per Fortnight to Megaliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-8 / 1e+6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliters per Fortnight to Megaliters per Millisecond
Hectoliter per Fortnight and Megaliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
megaliters per millisecond = hectoliters per fortnight × 8.267196e-14
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-8 base units, and 1 megaliter per millisecond equals 1000000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per fortnight-to-megaliter per millisecond factor of 8.267196e-14.
Simple example
1 hL/fn × 8.267196e-14 = 8.267196e-14 ML/ms
1 hectoliter per fortnight = 8.267196e-14 megaliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 hL/fn × 8.267196e-14 = 4.960317e-12 ML/ms
60 hectoliters per fortnight = 4.960317e-12 megaliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn) | Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/fn | 8.267196e-15 ML/ms |
| 1 hL/fn | 8.267196e-14 ML/ms |
| 10 hL/fn | 8.267196e-13 ML/ms |
| 60 hL/fn | 4.960317e-12 ML/ms |
| 100 hL/fn | 8.267196e-12 ML/ms |
| 1,000 hL/fn | 8.267196e-11 ML/ms |
Reverse conversion: Megaliter per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Fortnight
8.267196e-14 ML/ms × 1.2096e+13 = 1.000000028 hL/fn
8.267196e-14 megaliters per millisecond = 1.000000028 hectoliters per fortnight.
hectoliters per fortnight = megaliters per millisecond × 1.2096e+13
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megaliter per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megaliters per millisecond are in 1 hectoliter per fortnight?
1 hectoliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-14 megaliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per fortnight to megaliter per millisecond?
Multiply the hectoliter per fortnight value by 8.267196e-14. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megaliter per millisecond back to hectoliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megaliter per millisecond equals 1.2096e+13 hectoliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per fortnight?
Hectoliter per Fortnight (hL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a megaliter per millisecond?
Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per fortnight to megaliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per fortnight and megaliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.267196e-14 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.