Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Hours to Cubic yard per Seconds Converter — hL/h to yd3/s
Convert Hectoliter per Hours (hL/h) to Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per hours = 0.000036332 cubic yard per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Hours to Cubic yard per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-5 / 0.764554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Hours to Cubic yard per Seconds
Hectoliter per Hours and Cubic yard per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per seconds = hectoliter per hours × 0.0000363319616476
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per hours equals 0.0000277777777778 base units, and 1 cubic yard per seconds equals 0.764554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per hours-to-cubic yard per seconds factor of 0.0000363319616476.
Simple example
1 hL/h × 0.00003633196165 = 0.000036332 yd3/s
1 hectoliter per hours = 0.000036332 cubic yard per seconds.
Real-world example
60 hL/h × 0.00003633196165 = 0.0021799177 yd3/s
60 hectoliter per hours = 0.0021799177 cubic yard per seconds.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Hours (hL/h) | Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/h | 0.0000036332 yd3/s |
| 1 hL/h | 0.000036332 yd3/s |
| 10 hL/h | 0.0003633196 yd3/s |
| 60 hL/h | 0.0021799177 yd3/s |
| 100 hL/h | 0.0036331962 yd3/s |
| 1,000 hL/h | 0.0363319617 yd3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Seconds to Hectoliter per Hours
0.000036332 yd3/s × 27523.97489 = 1.000001056 hL/h
0.000036332 cubic yard per seconds = 1.000001056 hectoliter per hours.
hectoliter per hours = cubic yard per seconds × 27523.9748874
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Seconds to Hectoliter per Hours.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Hours (hL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per seconds are in 1 hectoliter per hours?
1 hectoliter per hours equals 0.000036332 cubic yard per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per hours to cubic yard per seconds?
Multiply the hectoliter per hours value by 0.00003633196165. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per seconds back to hectoliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per seconds equals 27,523.97489 hectoliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per hours?
Hectoliter per Hours (hL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per seconds?
Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per hours to cubic yard per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per hours and cubic yard per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00003633196165 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.