Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliters per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — hL/ms to ft3/ms
Convert Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per millisecond = 3.531466672 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliters per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 100 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliters per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Hectoliter per Millisecond and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = hectoliters per millisecond × 3.53146667215
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 100 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per millisecond-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 3.53146667215.
Simple example
1 hL/ms × 3.531466672 = 3.531466672 ft3/ms
1 hectoliter per millisecond = 3.531466672 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 hL/ms × 3.531466672 = 211.8880003 ft3/ms
60 hectoliters per millisecond = 211.8880003 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/ms | 0.3531466672 ft3/ms |
| 1 hL/ms | 3.531466672 ft3/ms |
| 10 hL/ms | 35.31466672 ft3/ms |
| 60 hL/ms | 211.8880003 ft3/ms |
| 100 hL/ms | 353.1466672 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 hL/ms | 3,531.466672 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Millisecond
3.531466672 ft3/ms × 0.2831684659 = 1 hL/ms
3.531466672 cubic feet per millisecond = 1 hectoliters per millisecond.
hectoliters per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 0.28316846592
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 hectoliter per millisecond?
1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 3.531466672 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the hectoliter per millisecond value by 3.531466672. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to hectoliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 0.2831684659 hectoliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per millisecond?
Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per millisecond and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.531466672 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.